Friday, March 27, 2009

CONFUSING IMPORTANCE

We currently live in a world characterized by a reversal of importance. What is important is not and what is marginal is considered important. This makes the words of the Lord Jesus Christ so true as found in Matthew 23:24, "Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel." We are living in a world of a reversal of cause and effect. A gnat is a small animal in comparison to a camel. These people are zealous for small unimportant things. When it comes to important things, they disregard them as trivial.

There are only two ways of thinking, spiritually and physically. Time after time in the Bible, the spiritual come into conflict with the physically oriented. The physically oriented have only one way of dealing with things, through physical force. They lack the ability to think their way through anything. When they cannot win an argument, which they are never able to do, they will immediately try to resort to physical force. This proves that they lack any ability to think. Their reasoning is the reasoning of an animal.

Reversing cause and effect has consequences. What is wrong is elevated in the place of what is right. Rather than rewarding those who do good, the evil receive what they do not deserve, blessing. This especially takes place through the civil government. Our civil government is attempting to create a sanctionless society. If you are the right company and you fail, you get the blessing of the Federal Government giving you taxpayer money to bail you out. These companies are assured of failure and are propped up to waste more resources.

We are living in an atheistic society. Man has replaced God. Man considers himself to be transcendent. In hierarchal terms, this elevates animals to the place where man is to be, under God. In some circles, animals are placed on the same level as man and in the environmental movement animals are revered and considered more important than man. The environmental movement hates man and love animals.

A recent AP article’s headline reads, "Don’t deny health care to pets because of worries about how to pay for it." This article tells how a woman spent $6,000 for her dog’s heart problem. This woman is clearly out of her mind. No animal is worth spending $6,000 on. Animals do not live for very long. The point is that this dog is going to die. If a vet told me it would cost $6,000 to save an animal, I would know that the Vet is out of his mind.

I can hear most women and feminist men telling me that I do not care about animals. I have three cats and a dog and we feed the neighborhood cats. I believe that you should care for animals but there comes a point when the decision is easy to make. Fido has lived a good life and it is his time to pass from this world. A pet is replaceable. Human life is not. These same people who would do anything to save an animal’s life, usually are in favor of abortion. They worship the creature more than the Creator because they are idolaters.

No comments: