NON-JUDGMENTAL REPORTING

It should be apparent to all that care to look below the surface of a matter that the media are apologists for evil. You will never find them condemning anyone for their evil acts no matter how heinous. They will, however, bash anyone that is doing anything that is positive and productive. They are forever bashing big oil for bringing their product to market. They never miss an opportunity to report that Exxon Mobil had another record amount of sales last quarter. This is true because of the present price of gasoline. The media reports this with the intent of saying that big oil is gouging the consumer because of record sales.

The media is concrete bound. They report only on what they see with their physical eyes. They do not understand concepts because of their arrested mental capabilities. When the media reports anything, it demonstrates their unconfessed bias. They will tell you that they only report the news without any agenda attached. Nothing can be further from the truth. The media is out to destroy anything good and holy and to lift up any despicable thing and any type of degradation as the norm. Their examples are almost always of those who are failures and they seek to make these failures as representatives of reality.

Knowing this up front makes the agenda of the media all the more transparent. It is easy to see through to their true intent. They may seek to disguise it but it is apparent to all who seek to use their mind. An Associated Press article regarding the Anthrax murderer Bruce Ivins is representative. The article reports, "The brilliant but troubled scientist committed suicide this week, knowing prosecutors were closing in." The reporter’s choice of words is what is disturbing. It is a poor choice that demonstrates that the reporter is seeking to evade making any judgment upon Ivins.

It is not as though the reporter was successful. He still made a judgement about Ivins by his wording. He was saying that Ivins was splendid and shining as a scientist but he was also disturbed. In reality, Ivins was a homicidal maniac. He was in no way brilliant. Brilliance belongs to achievers, not murderers. He achieved nothing but death for five individuals. Every good that he did is completely overshadowed by his murderous actions. Ivins deserves condemnation, not accolades. This is something the media refuses to do. By refusing to condemn Ivins’ actions, they are by default condoning them. There is no neutrality.

Further, Ivins is arrogant and a coward. He refused to be held accountable for his actions, so he took his own life. His choice of poisoning his victims demonstrates that he was an extremely detached and impersonal. He did not have the courage to face his victims directly. He chose to use an impersonal means of poison. He was a true terrorist. What is not good is that he worked for the government. Ivins has provided ammunition for the conspiratorial lunatics that the government is behind all disasters.